Biological Vs Humanistic
Jeremy Vigil
Psychology 250
July 22, 2002
Abstract
I
will describe both the biological and humanistic approach. I will then follow it with their
similarities and differences.
Overview
The
biological and humanistic approaches are two of six psychology approaches. The other four are Psychoanalytic, trait,
behavioral, and cognitive. These all
are different approaches to personality.
They each describe how we gain our personalities and what affects
them. The approach used depends on the
therapist and client’s personalities.
Some are more effective then others.
The effectiveness is determined by our personalities. I believe it is the therapist responsibility
to get to know the client to determine what approach will work best. A therapist is not expected to be an expert
in all approaches but they need to know an overview of all. This will help determine if their own
approach will be effective. Sometimes,
a therapist must admit that someone else would have the tools to better help
their client.
Biological
Approach
Therapists who use the
biological approach believe that personality is derived from your parents’
personalities. In other words, your
personality is genetic. When you are
born you will have a foundation for a certain personality. This is contrary to the blank slate
position. This is the belief we are all
born with no personality and we learn what our personality is from our parents.
Biological approach
therapists concede that biology is not the only factor in development of your
personality but it does lay the foundation for it. It was theorized natural selection has determined our
personality. The personalities without
survival skills are not passed down to the next generation.
We are not born with full
fledge personalities when we are born.
Instead, we are born with a temperament. This is a predisposition towards a certain personality. This does not mean we keep the same
personality all our lives. We are just
more likely to use a certain temperament.
You can understand people’s temperament by watching children
playing. They will be inhibited or
uninhibited. An inhibited child will
seem withdrawn and appear to be watching the other children instead of
participating. An uninhibited child
will start the conversation and interact with the other children.
Humanistic
Approach
The humanistic approach
explains we have control of our own personalities. We are responsible for our own actions. Therapists who use this approach believe the client knows their
own self more than anyone else does.
The client knows what problems they need to correct. This is demonstrated through the Q-sort
test. The client is given several cards
with personality descriptions. The
client is then asked to sort by what they feel describes them. This is a tool a therapist can use to
determines a clients personality.
Clients choose their
personality through their actions. It
can also be said we choose to be good or evil.
Your choices determine your personality. It is said we do not have to do anything yet people believe there
are things we “have” to do. Determining
the things we consider we have to do are windows into our personality. What things we believe we have to do are
items we consider important and add to our personality.
Humanistic people believe in
the here and now. They do not focus too
much on the past or future. Their motto
is to enjoy the day you are in.
The humanistic approach was
born out of the need for therapy for “healthy people”. The Freudian approach was focused on the
mentally ill. The humanistic approach
was needed to fill the hole. Although,
the humanistic approach is for healthy people they still have personal issues
that need to be resolved before attaining self-actualization. This is part of Maslow’s hierarchy of
needs. Only by knowing ourselves can we
obtain self-actualization.
Similarities
The first similarity is they
both conceded they are not the only approach.
Other factors contribute to your personality like your culture and
environment. Both the humanistic and
biological approached are not a strict as the psychoanalytical approach.
Another similarity is they
both are approaches for healthy people.
Research was not all done by the mentally ill people like Freudian’s
approach. The positive side of
personality was explored. This differs
from the psychoanalytical approach, which focuses on the negative side of
personality. These approaches are more
helpful to the masses because I believe most people have a healthy personality.
Differences
The
main difference is what controls your personality. With the humanistic approach, you are in control of your
personality on a conscious level and with the biological approach, your
genetics controls your personality. You
can also say that the humanistic approach is a conscious decision for your
personality while the biological approach is not. With the Biological approach your personality is set a birth
while the humanistic approach you are solely responsible for your
personality.
Conclusion
Both
approaches are valuable it is up to the therapist to decide which is the best
one to use and be the most beneficial.
They both have their strengths and weaknesses. If one approach does not work you should try another one. A balance in all approaches would be the
best coarse of action. I feel the best
approach is most adaptable to our personality.